<ul>
<li><strong>Replication:</strong> Incurs significant upfront "setup fees" (for glass mastering and stamper creation), but the per-unit cost for each CD produced after setup is very low. This is why it's cost-effective *at scale*.</li>
<li><strong>Duplication:</strong> Has little to no setup fees, but the per-unit cost for each CD-R burned is higher because you're paying for the blank disc and the burning process. This is why it's cost-effective *for small runs*.</li>
</ul>
This explains why services like Kunaki (duplication) can operate without minimums or setup fees. They bypass the expensive glass mastering process.
Step 4 of 10 in this module#664 of 1,000
4. Cost Implications: Setup Fees vs. Per-Unit Cost
Part 7 • CD Replication vs. Duplication
See a way to improve this point?
Community Driven
Help us keep this 1,000-point curriculum sharp for all creators. Suggest a wording tweak, report a changed tool, or share your thoughts.
Loading user progress & flight station...
In this module: CD Replication vs. Duplication10 steps
- 1CD Duplication: Burning onto Blank CDRs (Small Batches)
- 2CD Replication: Pressing from a Glass Master (Large Runs)
- 3The "Glass Master": The Key Difference
- 4Cost Implications: Setup Fees vs. Per-Unit Cost
- 5Quality and Durability
- 6Strategic Decision-Making: Which Process to Choose?
- 7Artwork and Packaging Considerations
- 8Environmental Impact
- 9The Role of the ISRC in Both Processes
- 10Your Actionable Physical Media Strategy
Tip: press ← and → to move between steps.
