Skip to content
SM Blueprint
Step 3 of 10 in this module#53 of 1,000

3. The User-Centric Payment System (UCPS): A Fairer Alternative

Part 1 • Pro-Rata Model vs. User-Centric Model

The User-Centric Payment System (UCPS), pioneered by services like SoundCloud (whose 'fan-powered royalties' are the best-known example) and long championed by Deezer, operates on a fundamentally different and arguably fairer principle. Here's how it works:

<ul> <li><strong>Direct Subscriber Payout:</strong> The money paid by an individual subscriber is directly distributed *only* among the artists that specific subscriber listened to.</li> <li><strong>No Global Pool:</strong> There is no single, giant pool. Each subscriber's money creates its own mini-pool.</li> </ul> For example, if a subscriber pays $10/month and listens to 100 streams, and 5 of those streams were your music, then 5% of their $10 subscription fee would go directly to your music (after the platform's cut). The money from a specific fan goes directly to the artists *they* listen to.

See a way to improve this point?

Community Driven

Help us keep this 1,000-point curriculum sharp for all creators. Suggest a wording tweak, report a changed tool, or share your thoughts.

Loading user progress & flight station...
In this module: Pro-Rata Model vs. User-Centric Model10 steps
  1. 1The Pro-Rata Model: The Giant Pool
  2. 2Structural Bias: How Superstars Benefit
  3. 3The User-Centric Payment System (UCPS): A Fairer Alternative
  4. 4Structural Benefit: How Niche Artists Win with UCPS
  5. 5Why Major Platforms Resist UCPS
  6. 6The "Transparency" Argument for UCPS
  7. 7Strategic Implications for Artists: Advocating for Change
  8. 8How UCPS Impacts Stream Value
  9. 9Artist Action: Focus on Fan Engagement (Regardless of Model)
  10. 10Your Actionable Payment Model Understanding